DoD Information Assurance and Agile: Challenges and Recommendations Gathered Through Interviews with Agile Program Managers and DoD Accreditation Reviewers

This paper was produced by the Software Engineering Institute at Carnegie Mellon University in support of the Agile acquisition research agenda funded by the Office of the Secretary of Defense. This paper is part of a larger research study focused on understanding the implications of applying a rapid, incremental development approach, such as Agile, on the Department of Defense (DoD) acquisition process. An overarching goal of this research agenda is to identify areas of tension between Agile and existing processes and provide recommendations for improvement to those processes. In support of the overarching research agenda, several "point" papers are being developed on particular topic areas. The topic of this particular paper is the natural tension between rapid fielding and response to change (characterized as agility) and DoD information assurance policy. The authors gathered information for the paper primarily by conducting interviews with several DoD project managers and information assurance representatives. The interview findings are organized into a list of key challenges and recommendations. The paper also includes a five- to ten-year future outlook with respect to information assurance and agility in DoD. The opinions, findings, conclusions, and recommendations expressed in this Technical Note are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Department of Defense.

PDF [460 KB]

Authors

Stephany Bellomo

Carol Woody

This report is related to the following area(s) of work:

Acquisition Support

Technical Note
CMU/SEI-2012-TN-024
November 2012

Cite This Report

SEI:

Bellomo, Stephany; & Woody, Carol. DoD Information Assurance and Agile: Challenges and Recommendations Gathered Through Interviews with Agile Program Managers and DoD Accreditation Reviewers (CMU/SEI-2012-TN-024). Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, 2012. http://www.sei.cmu.edu/library/abstracts/reports/12tn024.cfm

IEEE:

S. Bellomo, and C. Woody, "DoD Information Assurance and Agile: Challenges and Recommendations Gathered Through Interviews with Agile Program Managers and DoD Accreditation Reviewers," Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, Technical Note CMU/SEI-2012-TN-024, 2012. http://www.sei.cmu.edu/library/abstracts/reports/12tn024.cfm

APA:

Bellomo, S., & Woody, C. (2012). DoD Information Assurance and Agile: Challenges and Recommendations Gathered Through Interviews with Agile Program Managers and DoD Accreditation Reviewers (CMU/SEI-2012-TN-024). Retrieved May 20, 2013, from the Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University website: http://www.sei.cmu.edu/library/abstracts/reports/12tn024.cfm

CHI:

Bellomo, Stephany, and Carol Woody. DoD Information Assurance and Agile: Challenges and Recommendations Gathered Through Interviews with Agile Program Managers and DoD Accreditation Reviewers (CMU/SEI-2012-TN-024). Pittsburgh, PA: Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, 2012. http://www.sei.cmu.edu/library/abstracts/reports/12tn024.cfm

MLA:

Bellomo, S., & Woody, C. 2012. DoD Information Assurance and Agile: Challenges and Recommendations Gathered Through Interviews with Agile Program Managers and DoD Accreditation Reviewers (Technical Report CMU/SEI-2012-TN-024). Pittsburgh: Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University. http://www.sei.cmu.edu/library/abstracts/reports/12tn024.cfm

Find Us Here

Find us on Youtube  Find us on LinkedIn  Find us on twitter  Find us on Facebook

Share This Page

Share on Facebook  Send to your Twitter page  Save to del.ico.us  Save to LinkedIn  Digg this  Stumble this page.  Add to Technorati favorites  Save this page on your Google Home Page 

For more information

Contact Us

info@sei.cmu.edu

412-268-5800

Help us improve

Visitor feedback helps us continually improve our site.

Please tell us what you
think with this short
(< 5 minute) survey.