Publications and References: Objective Confidence

SAT-Based Software Certification (2006)
Sagar Chaki

This paper presents an automated technique for certifying a program's adherence to safety and liveness criteria. The technique consists of two broad stages. In the first stage, a certifying model checker is used to generate a verification condition (VC). In the second stage, a decision procedure based on Boolean satisfiability (SAT) is used to prove the VC. The use of SAT enables us to construct extremely compact proofs..

SAT-Based Software Certification (2006)
Sagar Chaki

This technical note presents a framework for constructing extremely compact proofs of the satisfaction of safety and liveness specifications by source code. The approach is based on a combination of certifying model checking and Boolean satisfiability (SAT) technology.

Verification Across Intellectual Property Boundaries (2007)
Sagar Chaki, Christian Schallhart, & Helmut Veith

This paper presents a cryptographic approach for software certification.

Certifying the Absence of Buffer Overflows (2006)
Sagar Chaki & Scott Hissam

This report presents a technique for certifying the safety of buffer manipulations in C programs. The approach is based on two key ideas: (1) using a certifying model checker to automatically verify that a buffer manipulation is safe and (2) validating the resulting invariant and proving it with a decision procedure based on Boolean satisfiability.

Certified Binaries for Software Components (2007)
Sagar Chaki, James Ivers, Peter Lee, Kurt Wallnau, & Noam Zeilberger

This report presents an approach to automatically certify that binary code satisfies user specifiable behavioral requirements. The approach builds on proof-carrying code and certifying model checking research and generates a proof certificate that can be independently verified, allowing developers to trust the code that is produced without having to trust the tools that produced it.

Model-Driven Construction of Certified Binaries (2007)
Sagar Chaki, James Ivers, Peter Lee, Kurt Wallnau, & Noam Zeilberger

This paper presents a model-driven approach for generating certified binaries (executables) from component specifications.

Predictable Assembly of Substation Automation Systems: An Experiment Report (2002)
Scott Hissam, John Hudak, James Ivers, Mark Klein, Magnus Larsson, Gabriel Moreno, Linda Northrop, Daniel Plakosh, Judith Stafford, Kurt Wallnau, & William Wood

This reports the results of a PECT feasibility study the PACC team performed for ABB in the domain of power substation automation. It is representative of our approach and documents a number of important concepts, especially the notions of co-refinement and empirical validation.

The Potential for Synergy between Certification and Insurance.” First International Workshop on Software Reuse Economics (2002)
Paul Luo Li, Mary Shaw, Kevin Stolarick, & Kurt Wallnau

Written with the help of an expert in actuarial models and insurance, this paper argues that predictability of assembly behavior is a useful prerequisite for for-profit insurance of component quality and behavior.

Statistical Models for Empirical Component Properties and Assembly-Level Property Predictions: Toward Standard Labeling (2002)
Gabriel Moreno, Scott Hissam, & Kurt Wallnau

The paper provides a short tutorial on various types of statistical analyses used to describe measurable properties of components and assembly predictions, leading to a position statement regarding a form of standard component label.

Is Third Party Certification Necessary? (2002)
Judith Stafford & Kurt Wallnau

The paper offers speculations on the roles and interactions among these roles for various stakeholders in certifying properties of software components.

Software Component Certification: 10 Useful Distinctions (2004)
Kurt C. Wallnau

Certification is a practical, proven means of establishing trust in various sorts of things in other disciplines and is, therefore, a natural contender for developing trust in software components. This technical note introduces a series of 10 distinctions that can help in understanding different aspects of certification in the context of software components.

Find Us Here

Share This Page

Share on Facebook  Send to your Twitter page  Save to del.ico.us  Save to LinkedIn  Digg this  Stumble this page.  Add to Technorati favorites  Save this page on your Google Home Page 

For more information

Contact Us

info@sei.cmu.edu

412-268-5800