Software Engineering Institute Carnegie Mellon

ASP Main Page
About ASP
Areas of Work
News
CMMI Acquisition Module
CMMI-ACQ Model
Acquisition Patterns of Failure
Publications and Presentations by Topic
Presentations
Publications by Type and Date
Related Materials
Adventures of Ricky and Stick
Success Stories
Pilot Studies
Useful Sources & Links
Training
Conference on Acquisition of Software-Intensive Systems
Contact Us

Ricky & Stick - The Biggest System Isn't Always the Right Answer

Ricky & Stick main page

Tools, whether fishing rods or software systems, should be appropriate to both their intended use and their intended users. But often, there's a mismatch somewhere along the line. Sometimes, what the users want isn't what they really need. And sometimes, regardless of what they want, what they need is far from what they get.

Ricky's tumble into the drink came from this kind of mismatch. He was dazzled by bigger!, and paid no attention to the fact that the huge rod was far beyond his size and strength. Sometimes, organizations are equally dazzled by other things -- newer! fancier! better! cheaper! faster!" -- all of which are equally seductive and equally dangerous.

No one can doubt the DoD's need for the finest software systems possible, a need that will continue for the foreseeable future. But resources are finite, and they have been squandered too often, usually because realism somehow gets misplaced, just as happened to Ricky. So questions like the following are apt, and should be asked as early as possible: Are these the capabilities that we really need? Or is our true need somewhere else? What precisely will happen if we don't get this new system? If the acquisition is complex, or expensive, or controversial, does the system's potential benefit outweigh the risks should the acquisition fail? Is it imperative to take a large leap forward, or can there be several small steps? And are we trying to use a fishing rod that we have no business using?

When posing these questions, you will run the danger of "acting negative," or "being obstructionist," or "not thinking out of the box,' or some equally vacuous accusation. Keep the faith, friend. In response, you can point to a depressingly large number of failed software programs over the past two decades. Surely, totaling the cost of those wasted programs should be answer enough.


For More Information

Send comments or questions to asp-requests@sei.cmu.edu


return to top
Ricky & Stick main page
Acquisition Support main page