Software Engineering Institute Carnegie Mellon

Annual Report 2004 | Conferences

Conferences (FY 2004)

Held October 1, 2003 - September 30, 2004

Software Engineering Process Group (SEPG) Conference

March 8-11, 2004 Orlando, FL
http://www.sei.cmu.edu/sepg/

More than 1,900 software professionals attended the 16th annual SEPG conference, which offered an exciting variety of software engineering-related presentations and tutorials given by SEI staff members and process improvement professionals from around the world. The theme of this year's conference was "Enterprise Process Improvement: Better Products, Dependable Services, Cultures of Excellence." Keynote presentations were given by Dr. Thomas Wagner, executive vice president of corporate research and development at Robert Bosch, GmbH, president of the board of the Methods Time Management group, president of a federation of companies in the gas and water industry, and a member of the presidential committee of the German Institute for Standardization; and Dr. Thomas McCann, senior vice president of engineering for Walt Disney Imagineering. Wagner discussed the automotive industry in "Bringing Software on the Road," while McCann discussed process improvement at Walt Disney Imagineering.

Presentations by SEI Staff at SEPG 2004

  • Alberts, C.; Dorofee, A.; & Woody, C. “Considering Operational Security Risks During Systems Development”
  • Alberts, C.; Dorofee, A.; & Woody, C. “Information Assurance in Small Organizations”
  • Burton, D. “Harnessing the Power of a Team”
  • Cort, G.; McCarthy, L.; Miluk, G.; Paulson, P.; Penn, M.; & Sapp, M. “Results of SCAMPI B and C Pilots”
  • Chrissis, M.; Goldenson, D.; Konrad, M.; & Wemyss, G. “Interpretive Guidance—What We've Learned”
  • Davis, N. & Riall, C. (Honeywell International) “Managing Teams Using Quantitative Process Analysis at Honeywell Aerospace Electronic Systems”
  • Davis, N. & Grojean, C. (Microsoft) “Experiences of the First TSP Project at Microsoft”
  • Ferguson, R.; Gibson, D.; & Goldenson, D. “Why Make the Switch? Evidence About the Benefits of CMMI”
  • Ferguson, R.; Goethert, W.; & Siviy, J. “Trading Places: Measurement and Analysis in the Eyes of the Acquirer vs. the Supplier”
  • Garcia, S. “Beyond ‘Death by Slides’”
  • Gross, C. “Why Isn't Someone Coding Yet (WISCY)? Avoiding Ineffective Requirements”
  • Hayes, W. “Tailoring CMMI-Based Appraisals: A Workshop for Appraisers”
  • Humphrey, W. “Being a Software Professional”
  • Kasunic, M. “Conducting Effective Pilot Studies”
  • McHale, J. “Mapping TSP to CMMI”
  • Miller, S. “Managing People Capability Maturity Model Improvement Programs: What Really Works”
  • Siviy, J.; “Six Sigma Practitioners Answer Your Questions” (Panel Session); “Integrating CMMI and Six Sigma in Software and Systems Engineering;" "Six Sigma and the SEI’s CMM at JPMorgan Chase;" "The Evolution of Six Sigma;” & “The Six Sigma for Software ‘Fit’”
  • Willett, A. “Rapid SPI Planning with the Team Software Process”

CMMI Instructor and SCAMPI Lead Appraiser Annual Workshop
October 26-28, 2004
Arlington, VA
http://www.sei.cmu.edu/products/events/appraisers-instructors-workshop/agenda.html

Presentations by SEI Staff at the 2004 SCAMPI and CMMI Instructors Workshop
Behrens, S. & Mogilensky, J. “Competency Lifecycle Framework for CMMI-Based Certifications”

Chrissis, M. “Interpretive Guidance Status”

Cox, R.; Hart, G.; & Kelly, T. “SEI Partner Program Update”

Ferguson, J. “Plan and Status for SCAMPI V1.1A Update”

Ferguson, J. “SEI Appraisal Program Update”

Gallagher, B. “Acquisition Module”

Goldenson, D. “CMMI Impact and ROI Studies”

Hayes, W. “SCAMPI Quality Report”

Konrad, M. “CMMI Instructor Program Update”

Nielsen, P. “A Call to Arms for Software and Systems Engineering”

O’Leary, J. “SCAMPI Results Processing”

O’Leary, J. & Mogilensky, J. “SCAMPI Asset Library (SAL)”

Phillips, M. “CMMI Version 1.2 Status”

 

FloCon: Netflow Analysis Workshop 2004
July 20-22, 2004
Pittsburgh, PA

FloCon: Netflow Analysis Workshop is an invitation-only conference bringing together members of the security operations and analysis community to discuss their experiences with systems for large-scale network flow-based traffic monitoring and analysis.

The goal of this workshop was to provide a forum for analysts with similar problems and experiences to exchange lessons learned about their infrastructure and discuss analysis approaches. Also present were select traffic analysis researchers who discussed their work and provided additional insight.

Presentations by SEI Staff at FloCon 2004

Collins, M. "Empirical Analysis Of DDoS Defense: Technique and Observations"

Danyliw, R. "Lessons Learned by the CERT/CC and the CERT/NetSA Groups"

Danyliw, R. "Standardization Efforts to Support Data Exchange"

Kellner, M. "Detection and Analysis of Scans on Very Large Networks"

McHugh, J. " Locality-Based Analysis"

Fourth Annual CMMI Technology Conference and User Group Meeting
November 18-20, 2003
Denver, CO

The Systems Engineering Division of the National Defense Industrial Association, in conjunction with the Software Engineering Institute, sponsored the Third Annual CMMI (Capability Maturity Model Integration) Technology Conference and User Group.

The conference brought together users, adopters, and developers of Capability Maturity Models and those involved in internal process improvement to exchange ideas, concepts, and lessons learned concerning maturity models and appraisal (assessment and evaluation) methods.

The conference also provided a forum for the free exchange of ideas and discussion of the implementation methodology for CMMI, and afforded a unique opportunity to meet with the sponsors, developers, and stewards of CMMI, as well as those offering CMMI training and implementation assistance.

Presentations by SEI Staff at the Third Annual CMMI Technology Conference and User Group Meeting
Ferguson, J. “Use of CMMI in an Acquisition Context”

Goldenson, D.; Gibson, D.; & Ferguson, R. “Why Should I Switch to CMMI? Initial Evidence About Impact and Value Added”

Garcia, S. “Preliminary Insights Working with CMMI in Small Organizations”

Goldenson, D. “Evidence About the Benefits of CMMI: What We Already Know and What We Need to Know”

Kasunic, M. “Fiscal Year 2003 Survey of Acquisition Project Managers”

Nielsen, P. “Systems Engineering and Process Improvement—Challenges and Opportunities”

International Process Research Consortium (IPRC) Workshop 1
August 11-13, 2004
Huntington Beach, CA
http://www.sei.cmu.edu/iprc/calendar.html

Twenty-nine leaders from industry and academia attended the inaugural IPRC workshop. In this meeting, consortium members took a first cut at generating the process research concepts that will be evaluated, synthesized, and prioritized in five subsequent workshops. Organizations that were represented included the Polytechnic University of Madrid; National Research Council Canada; the Italian National Research Council; National ICT, Australia; Korea University; Irish Software Engineering Research Consortium; National Autonomous University of Mexico; Fraunhofer Institute for Experimental Software Engineering; Blekinge Institute of Technology; Robert Bosch, GmbH; the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center; Lockheed Martin Corporation; and Satyam Computer Services, Ltd.

Presentations by SEI Staff at the 2004 IPRC Workshop
Herbsleb, J. "What's Next in Software Process Research"

Konrad, M. "Software Challenges"

Ninth Annual European SEPG Conference 2004
June 14-17, 2004
London, England
http://www.espi.org/

The European SEPG conference is the premier process improvement event in Europe. Leaders, innovators, and practitioners from Europe and around the world meet to explore methods, tools, and process improvements that aim to increase business performance through quality and productivity gains.

Presentations by SEI Staff at the Ninth Annual European SEPG Conference 2004
Fagerhus, G. “European Dimension of the SEI”

Goldenson, D.; Gibson, D.; & Ferguson, R. “Making the Switch? Evidence About the Benefits of CMMI”

Hart, G. & Cox, R. “SEI Partner Network and the Code of Professional Conduct”

Hayes, W. “SCAMPI B&C: Right Sizing Appraisals”

McHale, J. “Mapping the Team Software Process to the CMMI”

McHale, J. “Team Software Process and CMMI—Real Benefits for Project & Programme Managers”

Phillips, M. “CMMI Update: Current Status and Where We Are Going”

Tyson, B.; Brownsword, L.; & Brownsword, R. (Number Six Software) “Leveraging the Rational Unified Process and CMMI for Real-World Successes”

Wemyss, G. “CMMI Interpretive Guidance—What We've Learned”

Woody, C. “Improve Operational Security—Consider Security Risk During Development”

Woody, C.; Hall, A. (Praxis Critical Systems); & Clark, J. (University of York) “Panel: Can Secure Systems Be Built Using Today’s Development Processes?”

Wynn, D. (CSC Computer Sciences Ltd.) & Phillips, M. “Surveillance: An Approach to Supporting Multiple Process Improvement Initiatives”

Zubrow, D. “Measuring Software Product Quality”

Tutorials by SEI Staff at the 2004 E-SEPG Conference

Hayes, W. & Glover, M. “Tailoring CMMI-Based Appraisals: A Workshop on Using the Family of SCAMPI Appraisal Methods”

 

SCAMPI and CMMI Instructors Workshop
November 4-6, 2003
Arlington, VA

The SCAMPI Lead Appraiser and CMMI Instructors annual workshop was held November 4-6, 2003, at the Marriott Crystal City, Arlington, VA, with 130 lead appraisers and instructors attending.

Presentations by SEI staff at the SCAMPI and CMMI Instructors Workshop
Chrissis, M. “Interpretive Guidance Project Update”

Goldenson, D. & Gibson, D. “Why Should I Switch to CMMI? Initial Evidence About Impact and Value Added”

Hart, G.; White D.; & Maher, J. (Organization & Process Improvement, Inc.) “SEI Transition Partner Program Update”

Hayes, W. “B&C Development Project Status Briefing”

Johnson, M. “Updated Team SCAMPI Appraisal Team Training (ATT) Preview”

Kitson, D. “SCAMPI and International Standards: Future Directions”

Kitson, D. “SEI Appraiser Program: Future Directions”

Masters, S. “Roll Out of SW-CMM SCAMPI”

McHale, J. & Konrad, M. “Mapping TSP to CMMI; Integrated Process Improvement with CMMI and PSP/TSP”

Mogilensky, J. “SCAMPI Asset Library (SAL)

O'Leary, J. “The SCAMPI Compliance Process”

Phillips, M. “CMMI—Technical Notes and What's Next”

SEI Software Architecture Workshop for Educators
August 16-18, 2004
Pittsburgh, PA

This very successful workshop brought 10 college professors together to learn about software architecture, develop ideas about how to include software architecture in courses, and form the kernel of a community of software architecture educators.

The workshop began with a two-day course, “Software Architecture: Principles and Practices,” which is the root course in the SEI Software Architecture curriculum. This course introduced the basic concepts of software architecture including the relationship between system qualities and software architecture, architecture definition, architecture evaluation, architecture documentation, and architecture as a reusable asset. This course emphasized the importance of the business or mission context in which systems are designed and built. The third day consisted of a brainstorming session, led by SEI architecture team members, on the inclusion of SEI software architecture concepts and methods in academic courses.

Participants in the Software Architecture Workshop for Educators
Barrett, M. (East Tennessee State University); Bass, L. (Software Engineering Institute); Battig, M. (Saint Michael’s College); Chenoweth, S. (Rose-Hulman Institute); Hartman, J. (Embry-Riddle University); Jones, L. (Software Engineering Institute); Lutz, M. (Rochester Institute of Technology); Matthews, M. (University of South Carolina); Northrop, L. (Software Engineering Institute); Sanchez, A. (University of North Florida); Schahczenski, C. (University of Montana); Tomayko, J. (Software Engineering Institute); & Willis, R. (Hampton University)

Seventh DoD Software Product Line Workshop—Initiating Software Product Line Adoption in the DoD
Arlington, VA
September 22, 2004

The Seventh Annual DoD Software Product Line Workshop, “Initiating Software Product Line Adoption in the DoD,” was held in Arlington, VA, in September 2004. Twenty people from the DoD government and contractor community who are actively engaged in software product line practice came together to share experiences, issues, and ideas for launching product lines in the DoD environment. This year's attendees further reinforced the trend that organizations were implementing software product lines in the DoD context, rather than just thinking about it.

Members of the following organizations participated in the workshop: Austin Info Systems, PEO Aviation, Northrop Grumman, Rockwell Collins, United Defense LP, Argon Engineering Associates, NAVSEA Warfare Centers, Department of the Navy, Program Executive Office, U.S. Army Training Support Center, and U.S. Army PEO STRI.

Presentations by SEI Staff at the Seventh DoD Software Product Line Workshop
Northrop, L. “Software Product Lines”

Seventh International Symposium, CBSE 2004
May 24-25, 2004
Edinburgh, UK

Component-Based Software Engineering (CBSE) concerns the development of software-intensive systems from reusable parts (components), the development of such reusable parts, and the maintenance and improvement of systems by means of component replacement and customization. Although CBSE holds considerable promise, many challenges face both researchers and practitioners in establishing CBSE as an efficient and proven engineering discipline. CBSE has been the focus of six workshops, held at the most recent six International Conferences on Software Engineering (ICSE). The premise of the last three CBSE workshops was that the long-term success of component-based development depends on the viability of an established science and technology foundation for achieving predictable quality in component-based systems. The intent of this symposium was to build on this premise and to provide a forum for more in-depth and substantive treatment of topics pertaining to predictability. This symposium brought together researchers and practitioners from a variety of disciplines related to CBSE to help establish cross-discipline insights, to provide a forum for presenting and discussing innovative approaches to CBSE, and to improve cooperation and mutual understanding.

Presentations by SEI Staff at the CBSE 2004 Symposium
Simons, K. & Stafford, J. “CMEH: Container Managed Exception Handling for Increased Assembly Robustness”

Software and Systems Engineering Process Group Australia Conference, 2004
September 27-29, 2004
Adelaide, Australia
http://www.sepgaustconference.webls.net/

The Software Quality Institute, Griffith University, and the SEI co-sponsored the SEPG Australia Conference 2004, which was held at the Stamford Grand hotel in Glenelg on September 27-29, 2004. The conference theme was "Learning from Experience" and concentrated on gaining lessons learned from improvement experiences and passing these on to other industry practitioners.

Presentations by SEI Staff at the Software and Systems Engineering Process Group Australia Conference, 2004
Chrissis, M. “CMMI Today”

Garcia, S. “Beyond Death By Slides”

Garcia, S. “Implementing CMMI in Small Settings: Results from the Huntsville, Alabama Pilots”

Software Engineering Process Group Latin America (SEPG-LA) 2004
November 8-10, 2004
Guadalajara, Mexico
http://www.esi.es/SEPGLA/index_eng.html

SEPG LA 2004 was the first in a series of annual SEPG LA conferences that rotated through selected Latin American countries.

The theme of SEPG LA 2004 was, "Quality Software for a Competitive Enterprise." The conference was geared toward professionals who are proactive in systematic improvement of people, process, and technology in organizations where software is a key contributor to business success.

Keynote Address
Humphrey, W. “Winning with Software”

Presentations by SEI Staff at SEPG-LA 2004
Brownsword, L. “Interpreting the CMMI for COTS”

Hayes, W. “New Approaches to SCAMPI Appraisal Methods”

Lewis, G. & Garcia, S. “What to Do When You Have Interoperability Requirements?”

McHale, J.; Montesde Oca, C. (CIMAT); Seshagiri, G. (AIS); Vidrio Delgadillo, R. (Quarksoft); & Serrano, M., moderator (CIMAT) “Panel Session: PSP and TSP as an Effective Option for Process Improvement in Small and Medium Organizations”

Tutorials by SEI Staff at SEPG-LA 2004
McHale, J. & Serrano M. (CIMAT) “Introduction to PSP and TSP and its Relationship to CMMI”

Garcia, S.; Lopez, F. (AMCIS); & Quintanilla, G. (BrightWork) “Process Improvement Based on Process Models”

Garcia, S. & Herbert, J. (ESICenter UNISINOS) “Implementing CMMI in Small Organizations”

Southeastern Software Engineering Conference
March 29-31, 2004
Huntsville, AL

The third annual Southeastern Software Engineering Conference was conducted March 29-31, 2004 at the Von Braun Center in Huntsville, AL. Two pre-conference seminars were held at off-site locations on March 29, 2004, followed by the signature conference on March 30-31 at the Von Braun Center’s South Hall. The conference provided an opportunity for software engineers, programmers, and computer scientists to discuss the latest developments in software engineering and software program management. The conference featured two days of invited and refereed presentations, a doctoral symposium, industrial exhibits, and a job fair.

The event was co-sponsored by the Tennessee Valley Chapter of the National Defense Industrial Association, the Software Engineering Institute (SEI), and the University of Alabama at Huntsville. In addition to the named sponsors, the Software Engineering Directorate of the U.S. Army Research, Development, and Engineering Command's Aviation and Missile Research Development and Engineering Center, the Army Space and Missile Defense Command, and NASA’s Marshall Space Flight Center participated in the conference. The 2004 conference was attended by more than 550 software professionals.

Team Software Process (TSP) User Group
September 27-28, 2004
Pittsburgh, PA
http://www.sei.cmu.edu/tsp/user-group.html

The Team Software Process User Group (TUG) provides a forum for developers and users of TSP and PSP, as well as SEI Partners offering training and coaching.

This year, the conference attracted 90 attendees, doubling last year's attendance. Attendees enjoyed 13 presentations, as well as keynote addresses by Watts Humphrey, developer of the TSP, Paul Nielsen, the new director and CEO of the SEI, and Sham Banerji, from Texas Instruments India.

Keynote Addresses
Humphrey, W. “The Future of Software Engineering”

Nielsen, P. “Initial Impressions: Why I Came to the Software Engineering Institute”

Presentations by SEI Staff at the Team Software Process User Group Meeting
Willett, A. "TSP Excel Tool Update"

Third Acquisition of Software-Intensive Systems Conference
January 26-28, 2004
Arlington, Virginia

Sponsored by the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense (Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics), Defense Systems, Software-Intensive Systems and the SEI, this conference provides an opportunity for employees of government acquisition organizations, their support agencies, and federal government contractors to share experiences and insights about software acquisition.

The conference focused on improving complex systems acquisition throughout government. It drew from the experience and expertise of practitioners in the field to provide the best insight for acquisition professionals who are trying to enhance the effectiveness of their methods and techniques.

More than 200 people participated, representing organizations such as the Aerospace Corporation; American University; The Boeing Company; the Fraunhofer Center for Experimental Software Engineering; George Washington University; Office of the Secretary of Defense; Missile Defense Agency; NASA; the U.S. Air Force; U.S. Army; and the U.S. Navy.

Presentations by SEI Staff at the 2004 Acquisition of Software-Intensive Systems Conference
Albert, C.; Bergey, J.; Goethert, W.; & Morris, E. “Guidelines for Acquisition Planning”

Borden, D.; Beynon, D.; Imai, G.; & Kennedy, J. “NAVAIR Software Acquisition Improvement”

Campbell, G. "Reconsidering the Role of Systems Engineering in DoD Software Problems"

Carney, D.; Morris, E.; & Place, P. “Improving Acquisition through COTS Risk Identification”

Cohen, S; Zubrow, D.; & Dunn, E. “Product Line Acquisition and Measurement at NUWC”

Gallagher, B. “Accelerating the Adoption of Improved Practices Using Acquisition Pilots”

Gallagher, B. “Using the CMMI in Acquisition Environments”

Meyers, B.; Levine, L.; Morris, E.; Place, P.; & Plakosh, D. “SOSI: System of Systems Interoperability”

Monarch, I.; Sisti, F.; Ambrose, K.; & Blanchette, S. “Why Not Network Centric Acquisition?”

Phillips, M. “CMMI Today & Process Maturity Profile”

Ryan, C. & Gallagher, B. “SCAMPI B/C Pilots in Acquisition Environments”

Siviy, J.; Goethert, W.; & Ferguson, R. “An Acquirer's Guide to Navigating Contractor Data”

Smith, D. “The Application of OAR in a Lead System Integrator Context”

Smith, J. “An Alternative to TRLs for COTS Software-Intensive Systems”

Williams, R.; Ambrose, K.; & Bentrem, L. “The Diagnostic Roadmap: Progress in Developing an Integrated View of Risk Identification and Analysis Techniques”

Third International Conference on COTS-Based Software Systems
February 1-4, 2004
Redondo Beach, CA
http://www.iccbss.org/2004/index.html

The Third International Conference on COTS-Based Software Systems (ICCBSS), held February 1-4, 2004 in Redondo Beach, CA, continued to make significant contributions to the growing field of commercial off-the-shelf (COTS)-based system practice and research.

Approximately 175 attendees from North America, South America, Europe, Asia, and Australia gathered to exchange ideas and results. A maturation of the state of the practice was seen in a shift of conference emphasis from selecting a COTS product to engineering and managing the development and sustainment of complex COTS-based systems.

The major sponsors of the ICCBSS conference series are the Canadian National Research Council, the SEI, European Software Institute, and University of Southern California Center for Software Engineering. Northrop Grumman Corporation provided additional corporate sponsorship for ICCBSS 2004. Conference organizers included members from the sponsoring organizations as well as the University of Hawaii and the University of Maryland. Further information, including information about how to order the proceedings from Springer-Verlag, is available at the conference Web site.

Presentations by SEI Staff at ICCBSS 2004
Anderson, W. “COTS Selection: Adoption in a Small Business Environment”

Brooks, M. & Brownsword, L. “Managing the COTS Chaos: Experiences from the Trenches Using the Evolutionary Process for Integrating COTS-Based Systems”

Garcia, S.; Robert, J.; & Estrin, L. “Managing Technology Adoption Risk”

Lewis, G. & Morris, E. "From System Requirements to COTS Evaluation Criteria"

Lewis, G. & Wrage, L. “A Case Study in COTS Product Integration Using XML”

Sai, V.; Franch, X.; & Maiden, N. “Driving Component Selection Through Actor-Oriented Models and Use Cases”

Sledge, C.; Axelrod, C.; Lipner, S.; Lavine, C.; & Wegerich, S. “The Added Dimension: Information Security in COTS-Based Software Systems”

Smith II, J. “ImpACT: An Alternative to Technology Readiness Levels for COTS Software”

Third International Workshop on Requirements for High Assurance Systems (RHAS 2004)
September 6, 2004
Kyoto, Japan
http://www.sei.cmu.edu/community/rhas-workshop/

RHAS 2004 was held in conjunction with the 12th IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference, and was sponsored by the IEEE Computer Society Technical Council on Software Engineering (TCSE) and the Information Processing Society of Japan.

The goal of the RHAS 2004 Workshop was to bring together in a set of small focused working groups researchers and practitioners from the fields of safety engineering and requirements engineering to exchange ideas and their experiences concerning the engineering of safety-related requirements.

Presentations by SEI Staff at RHAS 2004
Firesmith, D. “A Taxonomy of Safety-Related Requirements”

Mead, N., "Requirements Elicitation and Analysis Processes for Safety & Security Requirements"

Third SPLC Conference
August 30-September 2, 2004
Boston, MA
http://www.sei.cmu.edu/SPLC2004/

The Software Engineering Institute's Third Software Product Line Conference, SPLC 2004, was a success, drawing 200 attendees from across the globe, with the majority of representatives coming from North America and Europe.

Paul Clements, SPLC 2004 chair and senior member of the technical staff at the SEI, stated that "we are here because we believe that software product line engineering is a powerful idea and that we have a shared vision: product line development is a low-risk, high-return proposition for the entire software engineering community."

This year's conference offered 18 presentations of quality research and experience papers, 14 tutorials, 6 workshops, 3 panels, and 7 product line demonstrations. The event was highlighted by keynote speaker Jack Greenfield, Microsoft architect for enterprise and frameworks, who unveiled Microsoft's plans to support the concept of software factories.

Other highlights of the conference included four new inductions into the Software Product Line Hall of Fame: General Motors' Powertrain product line, Salion, Inc.'s product line of revenue acquisition management systems, Ericsson's AXE family of telecommunication switches, and Phillips' product line of software for high-end television sets.

Presentations by SEI Staff at SPLC 2004
Chastek, G. & Donohoe, P. “Product Line Analysis”

Clements, P. & Northrop, L. “An Introduction to Software Product Lines”

Cohen, S. “Modeling Business Issues of Software Product Lines”

Cohen, S.; Zubrow, D.; & Chastek, G. “Developing a Measurement Program for Software Product Lines”

McGregor, J. “Quality Assurance in a Software Product Line,”

McGregor, J. “Testing Variability in a Software Product Line”

Tutorials by SEI Staff at SPLC 2004
Chastek, G. & Donohoe, P. “Product Line Analysis”

Cohen, S.; Zubrow, D.; & Chastek, G. “Developing a Measurement Program for Software Product Lines

Northrop, L. & Jones, L. “Adopting Software Product Lines”

Northrop, L. & Clements, P. “An Introduction to Software Product Lines”