<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Software Engineering Institute Technical Publications</title>
<link>http://www.sei.cmu.edu/publications</link>
<description>The SEI publishes reports that offer new technical information about
software engineering topics, whether theoretical or applied.  The following publications-related pages and SEI reports have been published within the last few months.</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 09:27:33 2009 EST</pubDate>

<item>
<title>A Scenario-Based Technique for Developing SOA Technical Governance</title>
<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 09:28:33 2009 EST</pubDate>
<link>http://www.sei.cmu.edu/publications/documents/09.reports/09tn009.html</link>
<description>Organizations can make the available SOA governance frameworks more effective in their organizations using the scenario-based tailoring technique introduced in this technical note.</description>
</item>


<item>
<title>Measurement for Improvement: Successful Measurement Practices Used in Army Software Acquisition
</title>
<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 09:49:33 2009 EST</pubDate>
<link>http://www.sei.cmu.edu/publications/documents/09.reports/09tn008.html</link>
<description>This concise report summarizes the findings of a study conducted for the Army to find and describe software measurement practices that are being used successfully. The study looked at practices in a group of Army programs. </description> 
</item>

<item>
<title>Incorporating Software Requirements into the System RFP: Survey of RFP Language for Software by Topic, v. 2.0
</title>
<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 11:27:33 2009 EST</pubDate>
<link>http://www.sei.cmu.edu/publications/documents/09.reports/09sr008.html</link>
<description> This special report is a compilation of request-for-proposal language samples used in Department of Defense software acquisition. The report also reviews federal acquisition guidelines.</description> 
</item>


<item>
<title>A Framework for Categorizing Key Drivers of Risk
</title>
<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 11:24:33 2009 EST</pubDate>
<link>http://www.sei.cmu.edu/publications/documents/09.reports/09tr007.html</link>
<description>This technical report features a systemic approach for managing risk that takes into account the complex nature of distributed environments. By starting at the top, examining program objectives and then identifying factors that determine whether or not those objectives will be achieved, managers can get a holistic view of their program's risk.
</description> 
</item>

<item>
<title>SEI Year in Review 2008</title>
<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 08:55:33 2009 EST</pubDate>
<link>http://www.sei.cmu.edu/publications/documents/08.reports/08ar/index.html</link>
<description>The SEI Year in Review describes the accomplishments of the SEI during fiscal year 2008 (October 1, 2007, through September 30, 2008). This Year in Review highlights a few ways the SEI creates customer solutions across a spectrum of challenges in areas ranging from digital forensics and process management to acquisition and architecture.
</description> 
</item>


<item>
<title>Making the Business Case for Software Assurance</title>
<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 13:18:33 2009 EST</pubDate>
<link>http://www.sei.cmu.edu/publications/documents/09.reports/09sr001.html</link>
<description>This report provides guidance for those who want to make the business case for building software assurance into software products during each software development life-cycle activity.
</description> 
</item>

<item>
<title>A Workshop on Architecture Competence</title>
<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 13:33:33 2009 EST</pubDate>
<link>http://www.sei.cmu.edu/publications/documents/09.reports/09tn005.html</link>
<description>This report summarizes a workshop on architecture competence that was held at the  SEI in June 2008, where practitioners discussed key issues in assessing architecture competence in organizations. </description> 
</item>


<item>
<title>Impact of Army Architecture Evaluations</title>
<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 10:33:33 2009 EST</pubDate>
<link>http://www.sei.cmu.edu/publications/documents/09.reports/09sr007.html</link>
<description>This report details the results of a study of 12 U.S. Army programs that used the Architecture Tradeoff Analysis Method (ATAM) or Quality Attribute Workshop (QAW) as part of the Army Strategic Software Improvement Program (ASSIP) effort. The programs report that the technologies are cost-effective, provide an understanding of key development artifacts, and foster communication among stakeholders to provide an informed basis for the program office, suppliers, and stakeholders to communicate their needs and understand how they are met.</description> 
</item>


<item>
<title>Deploying TSP on a National Scale: An Experience Report from Pilot Projects in Mexico</title>
<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 12:22:33 2009 EST</pubDate>
<link>http://www.sei.cmu.edu/publications/documents/09.reports/09tr011.html</link>
<description>Mexico seeks to be a more competitive player in the IT market. How can it get there -- and how quickly? The Software Engineering Institute's Team Software Process (TSP) could provide the answer. This paper looks at a pilot program sponsored by the Mexican Ministry of Economy that introduces TSP to Mexican IT professionals and develops instructional approaches and resources in collaboration with Instituto Tecnológico y de Estudios Superiores de Monterrey.  </description> 
</item>

<item>
<title>U.S. Army Workshop on Exploring Enterprise, System of Systems, System, and Software Architectures</title>
<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 07:41:33 2009 EST</pubDate>
<link>http://www.sei.cmu.edu/publications/documents/09.reports/09tr008.html</link>
<description>The workshop summarized in this report confirms that various architectural genres enjoy more commonalities than differences. Nevertheless, each one has its own important knowledge base, and openness among the various architectural tasks within an organization is growing in importance.</description> 
</item>

<item>
<title>An Initial Comparative Analysis of the CMMI Version 1.2 Development Constellation and the ISO 9000 Family</title>
<pubDate>Wed, 4 Mar 10:48:33 2009 EST</pubDate>
<link>http://www.sei.cmu.edu/publications/documents/09.reports/09sr005.html</link>
<description>A preliminary, high-level comparison of the CMMI Development constellation and the ISO 9001:2000 family of process improvement standards.</description> 
</item>

<item>
<title>CMMI for Services, Version 1.2
</title>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 16:33:33 2009 EST</pubDate>
<link>http://www.sei.cmu.edu/publications/documents/09.reports/09tr001.html</link>
<description>A model of best practices to improve the processes of service providers.</description> 
</item>


</channel>
</rss>
